Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2019-03-15 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than LG V30, getting a global score of 83.8 against 79.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A50 is newer than the LG V30, it's a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. The LG V30 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V30 features a little bit better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V30 has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A50. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A50 has just a bit better camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a back facing camera with way more MP and a larger sensor.
Galaxy A50 features longer battery duration than LG V30, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.