Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having a global score of 83.8 against 76.4. Galaxy A50 is a way newer cellphone, and it is also a lot thinner and a bit lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixels number per screen inch. The Galaxy A50 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A50 also has higher video frame rates, a bigger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments and a more mega-pixels back camera.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3900mAh.
The Galaxy A50 is a bit more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.