Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a score of 83.8 against 77.9. The Galaxy A50 is a a lot newer cellphone, and it's also incredibly thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a sharper display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A50, because although it has 4 less processing cores and less RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has better video frame rates, a larger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments and a back camera with a better resolution.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
The Galaxy A50 is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.