Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 global score. Samsung Galaxy A50 is an incredibly older cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50, but Samsung could make it just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. The Motorola Edge 50 has a brighter screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a just a bit better pixel amount in each inch in the screen, a little bit bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1220 x 2712px.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a slightly better memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 50 features improved battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos, a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.