Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus, getting a score of 83.8 against 79.7. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto G Stylus, even though it was released about a year before. The Galaxy A50 counts with a little faster processor than Moto G Stylus. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A50 features a bit sharper display than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy A50 also has a little bit better pixels amount per inch in the screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Moto G Stylus takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Moto G Stylus also has a way bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
The Moto G Stylus has as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Galaxy A50, they have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 and Moto G Stylus have really similar battery durations.
Galaxy A50 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.