Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z4's 79.8 general score. Galaxy A50's construction is just a little heavier and just a bit thicker than Moto Z4. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z4. Both of them have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the same pixels density and a same size display.
Moto Z4's storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A50's one, they have a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB and equal 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little faster processor than Moto Z4. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a bit longer battery duration than Moto Z4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Moto Z4 shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.