Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, having an 83.8 score against 79.9. Even though the Galaxy A50 is older than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's design is lighter and just a bit thinner. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a greater screen pixels density, a quite bigger display and a better 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality, a much better video quality and a back-facing camera with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A50 has a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.