Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is slightly better than the Galaxy A50, with a 91.8 score against 83.8. Galaxy A71 5G's body is newer, but a little thicker and heavier than Galaxy A50. Galaxy A71 5G has a screen that's very similar to the Galaxy A50 one, because although the Galaxy A71 5G has a quite lower display density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
Galaxy A71 5G features slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor, a much more megapixels camera in the back and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A50. If you want to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A50, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.