Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-03-15 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, having an 83.8 score against 81. The Galaxy A50 body is way newer and somewhat lighter than Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it is a little bit thicker. The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a bit bigger display and a bit greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a battery performance that is very similar to the battery life in Galaxy A50. Galaxy A50 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a bigger camera aperture and a way better 25 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.