Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-15 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, with a overall score of 83.8 against 81.5. The Galaxy A50 has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a little smaller display, a just a little worse pixel quantity per inch of screen and a lot lower 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy S23 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Galaxy S23 Ultra also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S23 Ultra has better battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.