Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic | Polycarbonate |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 205.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a bit better than Galaxy S4's 77.3 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A50 is heavier than Galaxy S4, it's just a bit thinner and also way newer. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S4 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a way smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density. The Galaxy A50 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S4, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures, a lot better resolution back camera and a lot bigger aperture.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 features a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.