Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2019-03-15 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A50's score of 83.8. Even though the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than Samsung Galaxy A50, it must be noted that it's also a thicker and a little heavier cellphone. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A50, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a quite lower 1080 x 2246 pixels resolution and a just a bit lower display pixels density. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a back camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy A50 and the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 both have similar batteries.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A50. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A50, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.