Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, with an 86.6 score against 83.7. Both of these phones have the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a a bit lighter and just a bit thinner cellphone than the LG V50 ThinQ, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better screen density.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A50s captures much better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures in low light environments and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a much better 48 MP resolution camera in the back.
LG V50 ThinQ has a battery duration that is just as good as the battery duration in Samsung Galaxy A50s.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.