Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 overall score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A50s has 10 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Galaxy A50s is a much newer device, and it is also just a little lighter and thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser processing cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A50s takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and higher 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50s counts with just a little better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.