Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 global score. The Galaxy A50s body is a lot newer, incredibly thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A50s has older 10 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory and lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processor. Motorola DROID Turbo has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A50s has a superior camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A50s also has better video frame rates and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels. Galaxy A50s counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A50s features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 3% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.