Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus's 79.7 global score. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy A50s body is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G Stylus, although both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better looking display than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Galaxy A50s has a bit better processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has more RAM.
Moto G Stylus and Galaxy A50s count with similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, they have a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a camera that is just as good as Galaxy A50s's camera, and although the Motorola Moto G Stylus has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos, they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Moto G Stylus's battery lifetime is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A50s's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.