Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is slightly better than Moto Z4, with a global score of 86.6 against 79.8. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, Galaxy A50s's design is just a little thicker and a little heavier than the Moto Z4. These phones include the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a bit more vivid display than Moto Z4. Both of them have a same size screen, exactly the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and the same screen pixel density.
Galaxy A50s and Moto Z4 both count with very similar cameras, and although the Moto Z4 has a bigger aperture, they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a same size sensor and the same video frame rates. The Motorola Moto Z4 features as much memory capacity to install games and applications as Galaxy A50s, both have the same internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A50s has just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.