Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Google Pixel XL, getting a 90.8 score against 81.3. The Galaxy A51 5G construction has the same thickness than the Google Pixel XL, but it's somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit superior processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel XL features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3450mAh. Galaxy A51 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a larger back-facing camera sensor and a way better resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.