Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism cube black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than LG V20, having a general score of 90.8 against 77. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is extremely newer than the LG V20's, but it is somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier. The Galaxy A51 5G features a little better processing power than LG V20, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 4 more CPU cores.
The LG V20 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels amount per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a better camera than LG V20, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking images in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V20, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A51 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, else you can save some money and buy the LG V20, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.