Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. These devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is notably newer and way thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it's a little bit heavier.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores (but faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater pixel quantity in each inch of screen.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F2 camera aperture, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a way more mega pixels back facing camera and faster video frame rate. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.