Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is better than the Moto G Stylus's score of 79.7. The Galaxy A51 5G design is a little bit lighter and a little thinner than Moto G Stylus, even when both were released only 0 months apart. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because it has a just a bit greater pixel density, a little bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G and the Moto G Stylus both count with incredibly similar cameras, and although the Moto G Stylus has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size sensor, the same (4K) video quality and the same resolution back camera.
Galaxy A51 5G is a bit more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.