Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-29 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than Moto Z4's score of 79.8. The Galaxy A51 5G is a newer cellphone than the Moto Z4, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Galaxy A51 5G has newer 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM. The Galaxy A51 5G has a little bit better display than Moto Z4, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little bigger screen and a just a bit higher count of pixels in each display inch.
Moto Z4's camera is very similar to the camera in Galaxy A51 5G, and although the Moto Z4 has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate and the same camera sensor size.
Galaxy A51 5G has a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G features greater battery performance than Moto Z4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh.
The Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.