Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-29 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 global score. Galaxy A51 5G's construction is much newer and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it's extremely thicker. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a bit higher pixel density.
Galaxy A51 5G takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting images and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G features a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.