Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-12-27 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2022) is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A51, getting a score of 86.6 against 85.5. IPhone SE (2022) works with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with Android 11 OS. The iPhone SE (2022) design is extremely newer, a little thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A51. IPhone SE (2022) has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A51, although it has a lot worse 750 x 1334 resolution, a way smaller display and a just a bit lower amount of pixels per display inch.
Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a better performing processing unit than Galaxy A51, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64 bits processor. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a much better camera than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a way higher 48 MP resolution camera.
The Galaxy A51 has a much greater storage for games and applications than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A51 features a superior battery performance than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2018mAh.
Although Apple iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A51, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A51. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone SE (2022), else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A51, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.