Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2024-01-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Phantom Black and Rebel Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, with a overall score of 85.5 against 84.2. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy A51 is much older than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, it's body is thinner and incredibly lighter. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version while Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a way better hardware performance than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a much better display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little worse display density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a camera in the back with a higher resolution.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A51, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.