Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-27 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is better than the LG V20's 77 general score. The Galaxy A51 is a way newer and a little lighter phone than the LG V20, although it's just a little bit thicker. The LG V20 features a little bit better display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels quantity per display inch.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a little faster processor than LG V20, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy A51 also has a larger number of faster cores. The LG V20 features just a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A51 has longer battery life than LG V20, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity. Galaxy A51 counts with a superior camera than LG V20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures and a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy A51 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A51, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG V20, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.