Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having an 85.5 score against 76.4. Samsung Galaxy A51's construction is noticeably newer, a little lighter and a lot thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A51, because although it has lesser cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Galaxy A51 has a superior storage for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A51 has a little better battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a much better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A51 also has higher video frame rate and a camera with way more MP.
Galaxy A51 costs a lot more than Motorola Droid Turbo, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.