Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's overall score of 77.9. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a extremely newer device, and it's also much thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo.
Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has 4 less cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a higher screen pixels density.
The Galaxy A51 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A51 captures much better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A51 also has faster video frame rate and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy A51 has a bit better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy A51 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.