Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's global score of 81.2. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. The Galaxy A51 is a a bit lighter phone than Motorola Edge 50, but they are 0.31inches thick.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A51, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels, a little larger screen and a little bit higher amount of pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy A51 has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A51 counts with a slightly better memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 50 features better battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a back facing camera with a higher resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and a much bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.