Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, with a score of 85.5 against 79.7. The Samsung Galaxy A51 design is lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, even when both of them were released only a few months apart. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a just a little better amount of pixels per inch of display, a quite bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Galaxy A51 counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus. Both of them have 8 cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Motorola Moto G Stylus's memory to install applications and games is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A51 one, both have a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB and exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G Stylus counts with a camera that's very similar to the camera in Galaxy A51, and although the Moto G Stylus has a bigger camera aperture, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates, a 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a same size sensor.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a battery life that's just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy A51.
The Galaxy A51 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.