Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 score. Galaxy A51 is an older device than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but Samsung could make it lighter and a little bit thinner. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A51, because it has a little larger display, a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Find X3 Pro captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger aperture to take better captures in low light situations, a camera with more mega-pixels, a lot larger camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.