Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a global score of 85.5 against 77.8. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Galaxy A51's body is notably lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is incredibly thicker and was released 4 years before.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better display than Galaxy A51, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a little greater display density and a bigger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a camera in the back with more megapixels, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy A51 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.