Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 score. The Galaxy A51 is an older and a little thicker phone than the vivo X60 Pro, but Samsung could make it a little lighter anyway. Both devices in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch in the screen and a little lower 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a little larger display.
Galaxy A51 has a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5 percent more battery size.
The vivo X60 Pro takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a camera with a 48 MP, the same (4K) video definition and a same size back camera sensor, the vivo X60 Pro also has faster 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.