Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is a bit better than the iPhone 8's score of 85. Although Galaxy A52 5G is incredibly newer than iPhone 8, it's way heavier and thicker. IPhone 8 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone 8 has a little sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a little lower pixels density, a way smaller screen and a way worse 750 x 1334px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way larger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a back camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy A52 5G has more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 8, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features a way better battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 147% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.