Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Google Nexus 6P, having a 91.3 score against 80.3. Even though Galaxy A52 5G is much newer than the Google Nexus 6P, it is somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier. Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a much larger camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and video and a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A52 5G has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.