Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Google Pixel 2, getting a 91.3 score against 81.6. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer device than the Google Pixel 2, although it's a little bit thicker and notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and the Google Pixel 2 both feature incredibly similar processing units, and although the Google Pixel 2 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a lot bigger sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.