Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is better than the Google Pixel XL's 81.3 score. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel XL. Google Pixel XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel density.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. Galaxy A52 5G takes a lot better photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A52 5G features much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with better battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.