Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the LG V20, with a 91.3 score against 77. The Galaxy A52 5G is a way newer cellphone than the LG V20, although it's a little thicker and a bit heavier. Galaxy A52 5G has just a little better performance than LG V20, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 4 more CPU cores.
LG V20 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much better camera than LG V20, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much more megapixels camera and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than LG V20, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G features a superior battery duration than LG V20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.