Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is a little bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's score of 83.7. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G body has the same thickness than LG V50 ThinQ, but it's just a little bit heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10, counting with a couple additional features.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM. LG V50 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
Galaxy A52 5G has a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos or video in poorly lited environments and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.