Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a overall score of 91.3 against 76.4. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Even though Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's incredibly thinner and noticeably newer.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixels amount in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a greater camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rate, a much better resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 15 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.