Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a bit heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's way thinner and also notably newer.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has 3 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also has better 30 frames per second video frame rates, a larger diafragm aperture and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.