Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Motorola Edge 50, having a 91.3 score against 81.2. The Galaxy A52 5G design is noticeably older, a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Motorola Edge 50. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 has a brighter screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a quite better 1220 x 2712 resolution, a little higher pixel density and a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
Galaxy A52 5G features a better memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.