Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is better than the Moto G Stylus's 79.7 score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer device, and it's also a bit lighter and a little thinner than the Moto G Stylus. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit faster CPU than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a quite larger screen, a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a larger camera sensor and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little better battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 13% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.