Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| -- | Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than Motorola Moto Z4, with a 91.3 score against 79.8. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10, providing you some nice extra features. Although the Galaxy A52 5G is newer than Motorola Moto Z4, it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly better display than Moto Z4, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with improved battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera and a bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.