Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 overall score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11, giving you some nice extra features and performance improvements. The Galaxy A52 5G design has the same thickness than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it is a little bit lighter.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a greater pixels quantity per inch of display, a quite bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a camera that's just as good as the camera in Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although the OPPO Find X3 Pro has a lot less MP resolution back facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. OPPO Find X3 Pro's battery life is very similar to the Galaxy A52 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.