Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 405 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A32's global score of 84.7. Galaxy A52 5G counts with Android 12 operating system, while Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system. Although the Galaxy A52 5G and the Galaxy A32 were released only 2 months apart, the Galaxy A52 5G is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher screen pixel density and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A52 5G has a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A52 5G features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same video definition, the same camera aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The Galaxy A32 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.