Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star's 82.1 overall score. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G construction is incredibly newer and just a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star's, although it is a little bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and the Galaxy A8 Star have extremely similar processing units, both have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a just a little greater display pixel density and a bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.