Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, with a overall score of 91.3 against 81. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a noticeably newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, but it is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit better pixels quantity in each screen inch, a little bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy A52 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy A52 5G features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way higher video definition, a camera with way more mega pixels and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.