Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy M30s, having a general score of 91.3 against 83.3. Galaxy A52 5G is a newer and just a little thinner phone than Galaxy M30s, although it is also just a little bit heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and Galaxy M30s has Android 11 version, giving some extra features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy M30s's processing unit is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G one, and although the Galaxy M30s has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy M30s features a display that's just as good as the screen in Galaxy A52 5G, although the Samsung Galaxy M30s has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little lower pixels count in each inch in the screen and a little bit smaller display.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos, a larger back camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy M30s counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 33% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.