Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-03-19 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than Galaxy S23 Ultra, getting a general score of 91.3 against 81.5. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Galaxy S23 Ultra has Android 13 version. Galaxy A52 5G features a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit inferior pixels quantity per inch of screen and a little bit smaller display. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra shoots slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a lot larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality, a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in low light situations and a back camera with much more MP.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy S23 Ultra has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.